After writing the first draft of the literature review, use the following checklist to assess the thoroughness and quality of what you wrote. Before sending it to your supervisor, ask a critical friend to read and comment on your literature review. A well-thought-out,well-written, and an interesting review of the literature is a joy to read.
Please note that the items in this checklist comprise a generic set of “to dos” when writing a literature review for your PhD research. Not all the items are relevant for all reviews. Select only those that fit your particular situation, and use them as a guide.
- The literature review is comprehensive (covers the major points of the topic.)
- There is balanced coverage of all variables in the study.
- The review is well organized. It flows logically. It is not fragmented.
- The writer critically analyzes the literature rather than stringing together a series of citations.
- There is a logical correspondence between the Introduction chapter and the Literature Review.
- At least three-fourths of the review focuses on the variables or concepts identified in the purpose statement and research questions. The remaining one-fourth sets the stage and gives the big picture and background to the study.
- For each variable or concept, there is some historical and cur- rent coverage; the emphasis is on current coverage.
- The review relies on empirical research studies, not opinion articles in “ pop “ journals.
- The review contains opposing points of view (especially if the researcher has a strong bias.)
- There is a summary at the end of each major section as well as at the end of the chapter.
- The bibliography contains at least 40 to 60 references.
- The majority of references were published within the past 5 years.
- Primary sources are used in the majority of citations.
- There is an appropriate amount of paraphrasing and direct quotation.
- The direct quotations do not detract from the readability of the chapter.
- Authors who make the same points are combined in the citation.
- The view synthesizes and integrates meaning to the litera- ture; it is not just a catalog of sources.