How to write a Critical Literature Review

Analyzing any data critically simply means to study every single segment of the information, while adding your opinions and views to it. On the same grounds is the Critical Literature Review writing based. It can be defined as a practice to go beyond the basic summarization of existing literature and throwing light on both the strengths and the weaknesses of any research material being reviewed.

When you attempt to question any information in the existing study, you are bound to add your judgment upon the same to lay foundation to your research objectives. Subsequently, only these objectives will help you commence your study. These days many university students are instructed to perform a ‘critical literature review’ for their research assignments, dissertations and thesis documentation. But, for this being a challenging task, only a few are able to make it through in the right manner.

This propels us, at, to enter into the story and offer our critical literature review writing service to research scholars. With our experienced writing panel, our services get backed up by confidence of timely and high quality results, leaving no scope for rejection. They, being not so money-oriented, have shared a brief insight on how to write a critical literature review.

Paving the way…          

Below are a few questions that you must answer when preparing for a critical literature review:

  • What is the topic under review?
  • How much wide range of literatures is available on the subject matter?
  • What are the sources of data collection in the literatures being reviewed?
  • What are the main issues discussed and interpretations made by the authors?
  • What are the research gaps in the form of relevant questions that were not tackled by the writer?

A critical literature review is generally prepared under following sections:

Detailed Introduction

At the onset, it is imperative to introduce your readers to the topic you are going to discuss through a critical literature review. For example, your topic is ‘the impact of brand endorsement on sales’, then you must define what ‘brand endorsement’ refers to. It is reasonable to present the aim and purpose of your study, while also briefing on the key findings.

Critical Evaluation

Once your introduction has been through, it is time to review and critique each argument of the literature. While being critical, you will need to outline any weakness in the existing study that supports your research arguments. For instance, if the literature, stating a positive impact of brand endorsement on sales, is based on the product enjoying a monopoly market situation, then it would not be a right indicator for the study’s finding. From fundamental flaws to shortcomings in the methodology, you will need to assess all.

An essential point to be considered is that while reviewing critically, you must not only outline the negative aspects of a study, but should also present the positive points that made you consider the literature. A good review explores both the sides of an argument ensuring a balance of arguments in the review.

Concluding the review

After the empirically reviewed main body comes the Conclusion section, where you briefly restate all the arguments that were discussed in the main body. You can also include recommendations and your judgment upon the arguments.


Follow the prescribed referencing style and prepare a list of references if other sources have been used.